Cognitive profiles associated with the fra(X) syndrome in males and femalesFREUND, L. S; REISS, A. L.American journal of medical genetics. 1991, Vol 38, Num 4, pp 542-547, issn 0148-7299Article

Assessing giftedness with the WISC-III and the SB-IVSIMPSON, Michael; CARONE, Dominic A; BURNS, William J et al.Psychology in the schools. 2002, Vol 39, Num 5, pp 515-524, issn 0033-3085Article

Relations of scores on the Stanford Binet fourth edition and form L-M: concurrent validation study with children who have mental retardationBOWER, A; HAYES, A.American journal on mental retardation. 1995, Vol 99, Num 5, pp 555-558, issn 0895-8017Article

Validation of an item-reduction short form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition with college studentsNAGLE, R. J; BELL, N. L.Journal of clinical psychology. 1995, Vol 51, Num 1, pp 63-70, issn 0021-9762Article

Utility of the Stanford-Binet IV abbreviated form for placing exeptional childrenDELAMATRE, J. E; HOLLINGER, C. L.Psychological reports. 1990, Vol 67, Num 3, pp 973-974, issn 0033-2941, 2 p., p.1Article

Mental tests and fossilsLITTMAN, Richard A.Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences. 2004, Vol 40, Num 4, pp 423-431, issn 0022-5061, 9 p.Article

Confirmation of the structural dimensionality of the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale (fourth edition)BOYLE, G. J.Personality and individual differences. 1989, Vol 10, Num 7, pp 709-715, issn 0191-8869Article

ABBREVIATED FORMS OF THE STANFORD-BINET, L-M: RELIABILITY AND EFFECT ON CLASSIFICATION OF INSTITUTIONALIZED MENTALLY RETARDED ADULTSPANEK PE; HAACK R.1979; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 45; NO 2; PP. 676-678; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

Stanford-Binet fourth edition : Useful for young children with language impairment ?VIG, S; JEDRYSEK, E.Psychology in the schools. 1996, Vol 33, Num 2, pp 124-131, issn 0033-3085Article

Stanford-Binet IV Intelligence scale: is its structure supported by LISREL congeneric factor analyses?BOYLE, G. J.Personality and individual differences. 1990, Vol 11, Num 11, pp 1175-1181, issn 0191-8869, 7 p.Article

A validity study of the Stanford-Binet: fourth edition with students with learning disabilitiesSMITH, D. K; ST. MARTIN, M. E; LYON, M. A et al.Journal of learning disabilities. 1989, Vol 22, Num 4, pp 260-261, issn 0022-2194Article

Racial differences in IQ: item analysis of the Stanford-Binet at 3 yearsMONTIE, J. E; FAGAN, J. F. III.Intelligence (Norwood). 1988, Vol 12, Num 3, pp 315-332, issn 0160-2896Article

Relationships between scores on Stanford-Binet IV and score on McCarthy scales of children's abilitiesCARVAJAL, H; KARR, S. K; HARDY, K. M et al.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1988, Vol 26, Num 4, issn 0090-5054, 349Article

ASSESSING GIFTEDNESS IN CHILDREN : COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF THREE SHORTENED MEASURES OF INTELLIGENCE TO THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALES, FIFTH EDITIONNEWTON, Jocelyn H; MCINTOSH, David E; DIXON, Felicia et al.Psychology in the schools. 2008, Vol 45, Num 6, pp 523-536, issn 0033-3085, 14 p.Article

Predicting IQ of biologically at risk children from age 3 to school entry : Sensitivity and specificity of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale IVGRUNAU, Ruth Eckstein; WHITFIELD, Michael F; PETRIE, Julianne et al.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics. 2000, Vol 21, Num 6, pp 401-407, issn 0196-206XArticle

Assessment of three-year-olds with the Stanford-Binet fourth editionJOHNSON, D. L; HOWIE, V. M; OWEN, M et al.Psychological reports. 1993, Vol 73, Num 1, pp 51-57, issn 0033-2941, 1Article

A comparison of the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised with the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale (4th edition) for mentally retarded adultsSPRUILL, J.Psychological assessment. 1991, Vol 3, Num 1, pp 133-135, issn 1040-3590, 3 p.Article

Comparison between the Stanford-Binet: L-M and the Stanford-Binet: fourth edition with a group of gifted childrenMCCALL, V. W; YATES, B; HENDRICKS, S et al.Contemporary educational psychology. 1989, Vol 14, Num 2, pp 93-96, issn 0361-476XArticle

Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-BinetGOLDSTEIN, D. J; SHEAFFER, C. L.American journal of mental retardation. 1988, Vol 92, Num 4, pp 379-380Article

CONSEQUENCES OF USING THE 1972 STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE NORMS.THOMPSON RJ JR.1977; PSYCHOL. IN THE SCH.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 444-448; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

ADMINISTRATION OF DIGIT SPAN ON THE WECHSLER AND BINET: DIFFERENCES THAT MATTER.HAGEN RL; DWRHAM T; SHANNON D et al.1977; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 480-482; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

Prediction of five-year Stanford-Binet scores in preterm infantsCOHEN, S. E; PARMELEE, A. H.Child development. 1983, Vol 54, Num 5, pp 1242-1253, issn 0009-3920Article

PERFORMANCE OF DOWN SYNDROME INDIVIDUALS ON THE STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALESILVERSTEIN AB; LEGUTKI G; FRIEDMAN SL et al.1982; AM. J. MENT. DEFIC.; ISSN 0002-9351; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 86; NO 5; PP. 548-551; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF OBTAINED AND ADJUSTED MENTAL AGE SCORES ON THE STANFORD-BINETCHRISTIAN BT; SUTTON GW.1981; PSYCHOL. SCH.; ISSN 0033-3085; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 420-421; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

METHODES PSYCHOTECHNIQUES D'EVALUATION D'UNE DEFICIENCE INTELLECTUELLE DE L'ENFANT. EVALUER QUOI. COMMENT.DAILY R.1978; MED. INFANT.; FR.; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 3; PP. 301-308 (6P.); BIBL. 17 REF.Article